Category: sizzling hot online casino

Amd E-350 Benchmark

Amd E-350 Benchmark Passende Bestenlisten

Informationen und Benchmarks der AMD E CPU. Der AMD E (​Codename Zacate) ist ein Dual-Core Prozessor mit integrierter Grafikkarte und. AMD E - Cinebench , Cinebench R15, PassMark und Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark-Ergebnisse. AMD ED - Cinebench , Cinebench R15, PassMark und Geekbench 3 CPU AMD ED - Benchmark und Technische Daten. AMD ED. Wir vergleichen im Detail AMD E mit Intel Celeron Spezifikationen, Spiele, Benchmarks. Score P mit AMD Radeon HD (1x) und AMD E Grafik-Punkte: CPU score: 1

Amd E-350 Benchmark

ASRock QCITX/WiFi. AMD A Radeon HD DDR3 CL ASRock EM1/USB3. AMD E Radeon HD DDR3 CL9. Beim 3DMark Vantage schafft der Zacate-Rechner Zähler im Performance-​Preset, der Revo mit Atom nur Punkte. AMDs integrierte Grafik. Weltrekorde erzielt durch Overclocking eines AMD E Prozessors. Klicke auf Zeige mehr um die komplette E benutzt in anderen Benchmarks.

Amd E-350 Benchmark - So gut ist AMDs neue Prozessor-Generation

Ranglisten y-cruncher - Pib n. Geekbench4 - Single Core. Ranglisten BlackBerry KeyOne n.

Don't worth Don't recommended. See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

Save as guest. Today's hottest Amazon Ebay. Average Bench: Based on 4, user benchmarks. Sail boat. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths Avg. Memory Latency Single Core Mixed Speed This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD E performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed Average Bench Based on 4, samples. Rank ARM-User, 14 hrs ago. MYS-User, 1 day ago. HUN-User, 4 hrs ago.

ARG-User, 1 day ago. PER-User, 1 day ago. GBR-User, 1 day ago. Tree trunk. Bench your build Size up your PC in less than a minute.

How it works - Download and run UserBenchMark. Group Test Results Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.

Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance. Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

Share a related link. USA-User level 6, Average 7 months ago. IDN-User level 3, Excellent 2 months ago.

Good with the special intergrated graphics. GRC-User level 2, Poor 13 months ago. ZAF-User level 1, Good 1 month ago.

LeadVic level Terrible 2 years ago. I purposefully avoided any large test suites PCMark Vantage, SYSMark because they would eat up a lot of time and I had no idea how long the rest of the benchmarking would take.

The Brazos test platform. As I mentioned in Part 1 of our coverage, the system felt snappy. I had the inch MacBook Air on hand it served as my Excel-runner while I benchmarked and interacting with the OS felt no different between the Brazos system and the 1.

That being said, the MBA is technically much quicker and more expensive. This puts its direct competition as really expensive Atom based netbooks, Pentium dual-core notebooks and low end Core i3 notebooks.

During my testing I measured a maximum total system power consumption of around 30W including the x LCD panel while playing games and around 25W while encoding H.

The system idled around 15W however AMD cautioned me that this number was unnaturally high. Final Brazos systems will be far more power optimized and AMD expects numbers to drop down to as low as 5.

AMD is confident we will see Brazos based systems deliver well beyond 6 hours of battery life. We spent our time in Austin trying to find out if its goals were realistic.

Post Your Comment Please log in or sign up to comment.

You can find it on trash picked computers. Can't even play youtube on its native resolution. Not worth the 4 digit price tag of the laptops back then not even 4 year before that.

Still managing Windows 10 for me and energy efficient. Does the basics :. Don't worth Don't recommended. See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions.

The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank. Save as guest. Today's hottest Amazon Ebay.

Average Bench: Based on 4, user benchmarks. Sail boat. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths Avg. Memory Latency Single Core Mixed Speed This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD E performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed Average Bench Based on 4, samples. Rank ARM-User, 14 hrs ago.

MYS-User, 1 day ago. HUN-User, 4 hrs ago. ARG-User, 1 day ago. PER-User, 1 day ago. GBR-User, 1 day ago. Tree trunk. Bench your build Size up your PC in less than a minute.

How it works - Download and run UserBenchMark. Group Test Results Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.

Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance. Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

Share a related link. USA-User level 6, Average 7 months ago. IDN-User level 3, Excellent 2 months ago. Good with the special intergrated graphics.

GRC-User level 2, I had the inch MacBook Air on hand it served as my Excel-runner while I benchmarked and interacting with the OS felt no different between the Brazos system and the 1.

That being said, the MBA is technically much quicker and more expensive. This puts its direct competition as really expensive Atom based netbooks, Pentium dual-core notebooks and low end Core i3 notebooks.

During my testing I measured a maximum total system power consumption of around 30W including the x LCD panel while playing games and around 25W while encoding H.

The system idled around 15W however AMD cautioned me that this number was unnaturally high. Final Brazos systems will be far more power optimized and AMD expects numbers to drop down to as low as 5.

AMD is confident we will see Brazos based systems deliver well beyond 6 hours of battery life. We spent our time in Austin trying to find out if its goals were realistic.

Post Your Comment Please log in or sign up to comment. Privacy Policy. Contact Us. Terms of Use.

Sie brauchen diese Informationen, wenn Sie eine bestimmte Technologie benötigen. Also, E oder Celeron ? PiFast with BenchMate. Integrierte Graphiken. Article source 7-Zip n. Geben Sie genau an, um welchen Fehler es sich handelt, wenn dies nicht offensichtlich ist:. Mining Hash-Raten. AS SSD. Geekbench4 - Multi Core. Der Mini-Lüfter arbeitet leise und adäquat. Geekbench4 - Single Core with BenchMate. Amd E-350 Benchmark Post Your Comment Please log this web page or sign up to comment. The system idled around 15W however AMD cautioned me that this number was unnaturally high. Final Brazos systems will be far more power optimized and AMD expects numbers to drop down to as low as 5. What is thermal design power TDP? As I mentioned in Part 1 of our coverage, the system felt snappy. Your opinion? Rank https://teammac.co/online-casino-legal/em-2020-spielgbersicht.php Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance. IDN-User level 3, Show Full Site. ASRock QCITX/WiFi. AMD A Radeon HD DDR3 CL ASRock EM1/USB3. AMD E Radeon HD DDR3 CL9. Weltrekorde erzielt durch Overclocking eines AMD E Prozessors. Klicke auf Zeige mehr um die komplette E benutzt in anderen Benchmarks. Eigentlich gilt für den E das, was auch schon für den E galt: Für den die im Vergleich zu den ‚Llano'-Prozessoren deutlich geringere Performance an. Beim 3DMark Vantage schafft der Zacate-Rechner Zähler im Performance-​Preset, der Revo mit Atom nur Punkte. AMDs integrierte Grafik. Benchmarks. PassMark. Single thread mark. Die Beste CPU. Diese CPU. PassMark. CPU mark. Die Beste CPU. Diese CPU. Normalerweise wird in Megahashes pro Sekunde gemessen - Anzahl der Millionen von Lösungen, die read more der Grafikkarte in einer Sekunde generiert werden. AS SSD. PerformanceTest Mobile. Lade Spezifikationen. Geekbench4 - Single Core. Vorteile von AMD E Also, E oder Celeron ? Geekbench3 - Multi Core with BenchMate. GPUPI v3. PCMark 7. Kurz: Zum Spielen Sylvester Snacks sich ein solches System ohne zusätzliche Grafikkarte nicht. Nachteile Zu langsam für Games. Dieser Wert wird jedoch durch den Wirkungsgrad des Netzteils etwas verfälscht - mit einem deutlich schwächeren Netzteil dürfte der Wert auch niedriger ausfallen. Ranglisten 3DMark11 Physics n. Cinebench - Geekbench4 - Multi Core with BenchMate.

Amd E-350 Benchmark Video

2 comments on Amd E-350 Benchmark

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *

Nächste Seite »